TTT® Technology

 

Inconvenience of traditional composting

• Needs long processing times in fermentation. between 6 to 10 months for the process to be completed.
• CO2 emissions are produced by microbial respiration. therefore there is a considerable decrease in the organic carbon present.
• High nitrogen losses (greater than 50%) by denitrification or evaporation of ammonium gases.

We also highlight as drawbacks:

• Need for large areas in the handling and turning of the composting piles.
• Production of unpleasant smells and possible leaching of wastewater.
• High costs in turning and mixing equipment.
• High infrastructure and building costs.

 

Advantages of TTT over traditional composting systems

• Composting time savings: 1/500 times 
• Space saving: 1/10 times
• Improvement of the environment: hardly any odors, without CO2 losses, no leached water or pathogens in the environment.
• Preservation of nutrients in the final compost: no loss of nitrogen or organic matter present. 

The innovative technology of a thermal mixer with enzymatic activation, which can avoid a large part of the problems of traditional composting, is currently being developed in taiwan, where there are already plants for processing bio-waste through quick composting, and from where we are going to incorporate the technology. necessary for enzymatic development, suitable for the bio-acids generated on the farm.
 

Treatment of organic waste through
Fast Composting TTT

 

Technology TTT vs. traditional composting

The TTT Technology is based on the use of a bioreactor, which together with the addition of specific enzymes to the organic remains, will transform the bio-ducts into stabilized organic matter ready to be used as compost in just about 3 hours of thermal treatment in the reactor., in contrast to conventional composting methods that take more than 6 months.

	Conventional system	TTT tech.
Time of processing	6 – 9 months	Less of 3 hours
Occupied area (3000 ton/year)	2 ha.	0,2 ha.
Harmful emissions to the environment	Odors, leached, gases: co2 and other gei, appearance of pathogens	Without secondary emissions, disinfected product
Work factor	Work intensitive	Automated
Weather factor	Eepending on the rain	Independent
Nutrients	Losses of 25-30%	Conservation 100%
Production ratio	Losses of 25-30%	Conservation 100%

 

• Classic composting requires long processing times for heap fermentation, ranging from 6 to 9 months to complete the process.
• CO2 emissions appear due to microbial respiration, causing a considerable decrease in the organic carbon present.
• Nitrogen losses are high (greater than 50%) by denitrification or evaporation of ammonium gases.
• It needs large areas in handling, adding water (irrigation) and turning the compost piles.
• Unpleasant odors appear and the possible appearance of leachate (waste water) that can harm the environment.
• The equipment for turning, watering, mixing… requires considerable labor costs.
• High infrastructure and building costs.

 

The requirements of the TTT system are:

• Investment in the bioreactor
• Investment in enzymes
• Energy cost

 

Compared to the traditional composting system, the ttt system stands out for:

• Savings in composting time: 1/720 times
• Savings in occupied space: 1/10 times
• Improvement of the environment: hardly any smells, without co2 losses, no leached water or pathogens in the environment.
• Improvement of the visual impact of the environment, by not occupying dirty areas with fermentation
• Preservation of nutrients in the final compost: without loss of nitrogen or organic matter present.